----- On May 6, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Alexandre Chartre [email protected] wrote:
> On 5/5/20 3:16 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> The sanitizers are not really applicable to the fragile low level entry >> code. code. Entry code needs to carefully setup a normal 'runtime' > > typo: code. code. Looking at updated tree, the reviewed-by is there, but there is still way too much "code". ;) Thanks, Mathieu > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <[email protected]> > > alex. > > >> environment. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/x86/entry/Makefile | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> --- a/arch/x86/entry/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/Makefile >> @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@ >> # Makefile for the x86 low level entry code >> # >> >> +KASAN_SANITIZE := n >> +UBSAN_SANITIZE := n >> +KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n >> + >> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_common.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector >> -fstack-protector-strong >> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_32.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector >> -fstack-protector-strong >> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_64.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector >> -fstack-protector-strong >> + >> OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_entry_64_compat.o := y >> >> CFLAGS_syscall_64.o += $(call cc-option,-Wno-override-init,) -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
