On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 01:14 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 17:42 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > Tested on Enarx. This requires a patch[0] for v29 support. > > > > Tested-by: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccal...@redhat.com> > > Thank you. Update in my tree. > > Sean, I'll fixed that whitespace issue too in my tree. > > General question: maybe it would be easiest that I issue a pull request > once everyone feels that the series is ready to be pulled and stop sending > new versions of the series?
My honest feelings about the series ATM are: 1. It is not perfect like no code never is and there are always issues. 2. Some things are very well matured, even more so than in a lot of mainline code I've seen. I'm particularly happy how the locking code has been converged. 3. Not worried to maintain the code in its current state. It is manageable. /Jarkko
