On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:17:43 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and > > written to the .config? > Two issues to fix before we can do this: > 1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt > 2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures > First step is to let all arch's use drivers/Kconfig
2) isn't terribly difficult, just takes some time and willingness of $arch maintainers to some changes, but please explain a bit more why it is needed...? > Let's get the two items above solved then we can revisit adding arch selection > to kconfig (where it belongs in the end). > And neither require a rewrite of kconfig... > > > Also, i'd like to propose sequencing of config-enable-build-this-unit > > in config file(s), thus Makefile(s) (sometimes very small and stupid) > > will be not necessary. Additional link ordering can be supplied as > > meta-config information there. Shell scripting, very ugly in the view > > of make syntax, will be natural in config files. Extending build > > process to get hidden dependencies or right linking/other magic is > > part of particular configuration. Hm? > Discussed before but so far no patches has shown up. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
