Andrew wrote:
> I'm getting 100% rejects from this - probably whatever patch it is
> patching got lost or unrecognisably mangled.
Yup - so far as I can tell, you didn't pick up the base patch that
this current patch fixes. So, no, I wouldn't expect this patch to
make any sense.
As I stated in this current patch in the diffstat section after the
'---' marker, this current patch applies to the base patch of Subject:
[PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
You probably didn't pick up that base patch because Nick and I are
still haggling over it. Well ... we've agreed, but I can't get the
scheduler to work as I thought Nick wanted, and I'm still waiting
to hear from Nick again.
==> So yeah - throw this current patch out.
Nick ... you there ?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
