On Wed, 6 May 2020 14:21:28 +0800 Tan Hu <[email protected]> wrote: > If the given type has fraction smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE, > __fprop_inc_percpu_max should follow the design formula and aging > fraction too. > > Signed-off-by: Tan Hu <[email protected]> > --- > lib/flex_proportions.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c > index 7852bfff5..451543937 100644 > --- a/lib/flex_proportions.c > +++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c > @@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop_global *p, > if (numerator > > (((u64)denominator) * max_frac) >> FPROP_FRAC_SHIFT) > return; > - } else > - fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl); > - percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH); > - percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1); > + } > + > + __fprop_inc_percpu(p, pl); > }
(Cc Jan)
