Hi David,
On 5/6/20 5:31 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
Fix following sparse checker warning:-
net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different
base types)
net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18: expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype]
protocol
net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18: got restricted __be16 [usertype] h_proto
net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:39:25: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer
net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:39:57: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-kariche...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@intel.com>
---
v2 : Added Acked-by from Vinicius Costa Gomes
net/hsr/hsr_slave.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c b/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c
index f4b9f7a3ce51..25b6ffba26cd 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t hsr_handle_frame(struct sk_buff
**pskb)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
struct hsr_port *port;
- u16 protocol;
+ __be16 protocol;
if (!skb_mac_header_was_set(skb)) {
WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: skb invalid", __func__);
I saw that you have applied the initial patch to net-next. Please ignore
this.
--
Murali Karicheri
Texas Instruments
