On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:08:33AM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
> The latest version of the On-Chip Controller (OCC) has a different
> format for the temperature sensor data. Add a new temperature sensor
> version to handle this data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eaja...@linux.ibm.com>

For my reference:

Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>

I assume this depends on at least patch 2 of the series, so we'll have
to wait for that to be accepted.

Guenter

> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
> index 30e18eb60da7..52af0e728232 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ struct temp_sensor_2 {
>       u8 value;
>  } __packed;
>  
> +struct temp_sensor_10 {
> +     u32 sensor_id;
> +     u8 fru_type;
> +     u8 value;
> +     u8 throttle;
> +     u8 reserved;
> +} __packed;
> +
>  struct freq_sensor_1 {
>       u16 sensor_id;
>       u16 value;
> @@ -307,6 +315,60 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_temp_2(struct device *dev,
>       return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%u\n", val);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t occ_show_temp_10(struct device *dev,
> +                             struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +     int rc;
> +     u32 val = 0;
> +     struct temp_sensor_10 *temp;
> +     struct occ *occ = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +     struct occ_sensors *sensors = &occ->sensors;
> +     struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *sattr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(attr);
> +
> +     rc = occ_update_response(occ);
> +     if (rc)
> +             return rc;
> +
> +     temp = ((struct temp_sensor_10 *)sensors->temp.data) + sattr->index;
> +
> +     switch (sattr->nr) {
> +     case 0:
> +             val = get_unaligned_be32(&temp->sensor_id);
> +             break;
> +     case 1:
> +             val = temp->value;
> +             if (val == OCC_TEMP_SENSOR_FAULT)
> +                     return -EREMOTEIO;
> +
> +             /*
> +              * VRM doesn't return temperature, only alarm bit. This
> +              * attribute maps to tempX_alarm instead of tempX_input for
> +              * VRM
> +              */
> +             if (temp->fru_type != OCC_FRU_TYPE_VRM) {
> +                     /* sensor not ready */
> +                     if (val == 0)
> +                             return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +                     val *= 1000;
> +             }
> +             break;
> +     case 2:
> +             val = temp->fru_type;
> +             break;
> +     case 3:
> +             val = temp->value == OCC_TEMP_SENSOR_FAULT;
> +             break;
> +     case 4:
> +             val = temp->throttle * 1000;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%u\n", val);
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t occ_show_freq_1(struct device *dev,
>                              struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -745,6 +807,10 @@ static int occ_setup_sensor_attrs(struct occ *occ)
>               num_attrs += (sensors->temp.num_sensors * 4);
>               show_temp = occ_show_temp_2;
>               break;
> +     case 0x10:
> +             num_attrs += (sensors->temp.num_sensors * 5);
> +             show_temp = occ_show_temp_10;
> +             break;
>       default:
>               sensors->temp.num_sensors = 0;
>       }
> @@ -844,6 +910,15 @@ static int occ_setup_sensor_attrs(struct occ *occ)
>                       attr->sensor = OCC_INIT_ATTR(attr->name, 0444,
>                                                    show_temp, NULL, 3, i);
>                       attr++;
> +
> +                     if (sensors->temp.version == 0x10) {
> +                             snprintf(attr->name, sizeof(attr->name),
> +                                      "temp%d_max", s);
> +                             attr->sensor = OCC_INIT_ATTR(attr->name, 0444,
> +                                                          show_temp, NULL,
> +                                                          4, i);
> +                             attr++;
> +                     }
>               }
>       }
>  

Reply via email to