Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I thought I'd mention the policy for 2.4.x patches so that nobody gets
> confused about these things. In some cases people seem to think that
> "since 2.4.x is out now, we can relax, go party, and generally goof
> off".
>
> Not so.
Sounds like a perfectly valid argument to me. Since Alan Cox's branch
seems to take on some of the more experimental stuff, perhaps it could
be used as an outlet for the pent-up patches untill 2.5 comes out?
Alan, could you elucidate your policy for accepting patches into the -ac
series?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com
Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com 4444 (Released under GPL)
http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
