On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 01:50:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:41:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currently copy_string_kernel is just a wrapper around copy_strings that
> > simplifies the calling conventions and uses set_fs to allow passing a
> > kernel pointer. But due to the fact the we only need to handle a single
> > kernel argument pointer, the logic can be sigificantly simplified while
> > getting rid of the set_fs.
>
> I can live with that... BTW, why do we bother with flush_cache_page() (by
> way of get_arg_page()) here and in copy_strings()? How could *anything*
> have accessed that page by its address in new mm - what are we trying to
> flush here?
s/get_arg_page/flush_arg_page/ ?
No idea, what the use case is, but this comes from:
commit b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
Author: Ollie Wild <a...@google.com>
Date: Thu Jul 19 01:48:16 2007 -0700
mm: variable length argument support
