On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:19:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:10 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:49:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > ==> build/x86/0xFD7B7323_defconfig/log <==
> > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: .entry.text+0x991: 
> > > unreachable instruction
> >
> > This warning looks correct, did you make a change to entry_64.S?
> 
> I bisected my local patches and found that I had a local hack that turned
> off CONFIG_RETPOLINE for testing something unrelated. I can reproduce
> it on linux-next with this patch:
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -447,8 +447,7 @@ config GOLDFISH
>         depends on X86_GOLDFISH
> 
>  config RETPOLINE
> -       bool "Avoid speculative indirect branches in kernel"
> -       default y
> +       def_bool n
>         select STACK_VALIDATION if HAVE_STACK_VALIDATION
>         help
>           Compile kernel with the retpoline compiler options to guard against

Thanks, that worked.

This one makes no sense to me.  It looks like the assembler is inserting
a jump as part of the alignment padding???  WTH.

0000000000000980 <common_spurious>:
     980:       48 83 04 24 80          addq   $0xffffffffffffff80,(%rsp)
     985:       e8 00 00 00 00          callq  98a <common_spurious+0xa>
                        986: R_X86_64_PLT32     interrupt_entry-0x4
     98a:       e8 00 00 00 00          callq  98f <common_spurious+0xf>
                        98b: R_X86_64_PLT32     smp_spurious_interrupt-0x4
     98f:       eb 7e                   jmp    a0f <ret_from_intr>
     991:       eb 6d                   jmp    a00 <common_interrupt>
     993:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     99a:       00 00 00 00 
     99e:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9a5:       00 00 00 00 
     9a9:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9b0:       00 00 00 00 
     9b4:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9bb:       00 00 00 00 
     9bf:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9c6:       00 00 00 00 
     9ca:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9d1:       00 00 00 00 
     9d5:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9dc:       00 00 00 00 
     9e0:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9e7:       00 00 00 00 
     9eb:       66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00    data16 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9f2:       00 00 00 00 
     9f6:       66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00    nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
     9fd:       00 00 00 

0000000000000a00 <common_interrupt>:
     a00:       48 83 04 24 80          addq   $0xffffffffffffff80,(%rsp)

-- 
Josh

Reply via email to