* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-02 10:14]: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:16:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > reviewed the August thread from your version 1 submission and the message I > > take away is that the code has been well-received and looks good when > > considered on its own merits, but selinux could probably be configured to > > do something sufficiently similar. > > > > I'd have trouble declaring that "but" to be a reason to not merge smack. > > I'm more thinking "let's merge it and see if people use it". > > I'm not sure this was discussed on the list, but as long as Casey doesn't > get rid of the magic symlinks (smackfs_follow_link), there's a clear NACK > from the VFS perspective.
Any rationale for this NACK? Caseys patch doesn't add something crazy like "make symlinks depend on environment variables"; also, we already have something similar in-tree: /proc/self. Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
