On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:07 PM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @@ -319,10 +316,13 @@ static struct platform_device *sa11x0_devices[]
> > __initdata = {
> >
> > static int __init sa1100_init(void)
> > {
> > + struct resource wdt_res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x90000000, 0x20);
> > pm_power_off = sa1100_power_off;
> >
> > regulator_has_full_constraints();
> >
> > + platform_device_register_simple("sa1100_wdt", -1, &wdt_res, 1);
> > +
> > return platform_add_devices(sa11x0_devices,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(sa11x0_devices));
>
> Wouldn't it be better to add the watchdog device to sa11x0_devices ?
Generally speaking, platform_device_register_simple() is better than
platform_add_devices(), it does the same thing with fewer source lines
and smaller object code, and it doesn't have the problem of lifetime rules
for statically allocated reference-counted devices.
One day we may want to replace all static platform_device instances with
platform_device_info instead, but right now there are too many of those.
I can change this one to a platform_device for consistency though if you
think it's worth it.
Arnd
