On 18-10-19, 11:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> +static struct platform_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> +     .driver = {
> +             .name   = "vexpress-spc-cpufreq",
> +     },
> +     .probe          = ve_spc_cpufreq_probe,
> +     .remove         = ve_spc_cpufreq_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(ve_spc_cpufreq_platdrv);
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Vexpress SPC ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

Strange. The -B option you used while generating the patch makes it
fails to get applied om my side with am -3. git doesn't get the rename
of file properly and shows me this conflict:

  
  static int ve_spc_init_opp_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
  {
@@@ -68,4 -697,7 +727,11 @@@ static struct platform_driver ve_spc_cp
  };
  module_platform_driver(ve_spc_cpufreq_platdrv);
  
++<<<<<<< HEAD
 +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
++=======
+ MODULE_AUTHOR("Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>");
+ MODULE_AUTHOR("Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>");
+ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Vexpress SPC ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
+ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
++>>>>>>> cpufreq: merge arm_big_little and vexpress-spc

Can you resend this patch (only) without the -B option ?

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to