Hello, On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:15:28AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > It seems compiler generates better code with : > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index > ab905c4b1f0efd42ebdcae333b3f0a2c7c1b2248..56de6ac99f0952bd0bc003353c094ce3a5a852f4 > 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -2238,7 +2238,8 @@ struct sk_buff *sk_stream_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, > int size, gfp_t gfp, > */ > static inline struct page_frag *sk_page_frag(struct sock *sk) > { > - if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(sk->sk_allocation)) > + if (likely((sk->sk_allocation & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | > __GFP_MEMALLOC)) == > + __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) > return ¤t->task_frag; > > return &sk->sk_frag; > > > WDYT ?
Whatever works is fine by me. gfpflags_allow_blocking() is clearer than testing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM directly tho. Maybe a better way is introducing a new gfpflags_ helper? Thanks. -- tejun