On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 6:41 AM Thomas Hellström (VMware)
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Hellstrom <[email protected]>
>
> LLVM's assembler doesn't accept the short form INL instruction:
>
>   inl (%%dx)
>
> but instead insists on the output register to be explicitly specified.
>
> This was previously fixed for the VMWARE_PORT macro. Fix it also for
> the VMWARE_HYPERCALL macro.
>
> Fixes: b4dd4f6e3648 ("Add a header file for hypercall definitions")
> Suggested-by: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <[email protected]>

Thank you for the patch.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>

> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: x86-ml <[email protected]>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/vmware.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmware.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmware.h
> index e00c9e875933..f5fbe3778aef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmware.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmware.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
>
>  /* The low bandwidth call. The low word of edx is presumed clear. */
>  #define VMWARE_HYPERCALL                                               \
> -       ALTERNATIVE_2("movw $" VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_PORT ", %%dx; inl (%%dx)", \
> +       ALTERNATIVE_2("movw $" VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_PORT                   \
> +                     ", %%dx; inl (%%dx), %%eax",                      \
>                       "vmcall", X86_FEATURE_VMCALL,                     \
>                       "vmmcall", X86_FEATURE_VMW_VMMCALL)
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clang Built Linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20191018134052.3023-2-thomas_os%40shipmail.org.



-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Reply via email to