Andrew Morton wrote:
>> this is actually a false positive - as the debug code constructs a
>> printk output _without_ \n. So the script should check whether there's
>> any \n in the printk string - if there is none, do not emit a warning.
>> (if you implement that then i think it can remain a warning and does not
>> need to move to CHECK.)
>>
>
> Yeah, it does that sometimes. I don't think it's fixable within the scope
> of checkpatch. It needs to check whether some preceding printk which might
> not even be in the patch has a \n:
>
> printk(KERN_ERR "foo");
> <100 lines of whatever>
> + printk("bar\n");
>
> we're screwed...
>
>
Isn't that broken on SMP (or with preemption) anyway?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
