Hi Dietmar,

On 10/17/19 10:58 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 11/10/2019 15:44, Douglas RAILLARD wrote:

[...]

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index d249b88a4d5a..dd6a35f099ea 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -159,6 +159,53 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct 
em_perf_domain *pd)
        return pd->nr_cap_states;
  }
+#define EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE 1024U
+
+/**
+ * em_pd_get_higher_freq() - Get the highest frequency that does not exceed the
+ * given cost margin compared to min_freq
+ * @pd         : performance domain for which this must be done
+ * @min_freq   : minimum frequency to return
+ * @cost_margin        : allowed margin compared to min_freq, on the
+ *               EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE scale.
+ *
+ * Return: the chosen frequency, guaranteed to be at least as high as min_freq.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long em_pd_get_higher_freq(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+       unsigned long min_freq, unsigned long cost_margin)
+{
+       unsigned long max_cost = 0;
+       struct em_cap_state *cs;
+       int i;
+
+       if (!pd)
+               return min_freq;
+
+       /* Compute the maximum allowed cost */
+       for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_cap_states; i++) {
+               cs = &pd->table[i];
+               if (cs->frequency >= min_freq) {
+                       max_cost = cs->cost +
+                               (cs->cost * cost_margin) / EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE;

Maybe you could mention in the header that this is the place where the
algorithm could be tuned. (even though it doesn't offer any tuning
interface, which is a good thing).

I'm not sure what you mean, the patch "title" contains 
"em_pd_get_higher_freq()", should it
also mention where exactly inside the function the margin logic is implemented ?

+                       break;
+               }
+       }
+
+       /* Find the highest frequency that will not exceed the cost margin */
+       for (i = pd->nr_cap_states-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+               cs = &pd->table[i];
+               if (cs->cost <= max_cost)
+                       return cs->frequency;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * We should normally never reach here, unless min_freq was higher than
+        * the highest available frequency, which is not expected to happen.
+        */

Maybe add a WARN_ONCE(1, "foobar"); here to indicate this unlikely event
(CPUfreq and EM framwork out of sync)?

Will do.

[...]

Reply via email to