On 15/10/2019 06:25, Yong Wu wrote:
On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 15:22 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 14/10/2019 07:38, Yong Wu wrote:
In our tlb range flush, we don't care the "leaf". Remove it to simplify
the code. no functional change.

Presumably you don't care about the granule either?

Yes. I only keep "granule" to satisfy the format of "tlb_flush_walk",
then it's no need add a new helper function.

Ah, I'd failed to make the connection that it ends up wired in directly to the callbacks in patch #5 - indeed there's no point churning the mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync() callsites here if they're just getting removed later anyway. In that case,

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
---
   drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 16 ++++------------
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index 8712afc..19f936c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -174,8 +174,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(void *cookie)
   }
static void mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
-                                          size_t granule, bool leaf,
-                                          void *cookie)
+                                          size_t granule, void *cookie)
   {
        struct mtk_iommu_data *data = cookie;
@@ -219,14 +218,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_sync(void *cookie)
   static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_walk(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
                                     size_t granule, void *cookie)
   {
-       mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(iova, size, granule, false, cookie);
-       mtk_iommu_tlb_sync(cookie);
-}
-
-static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_leaf(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
-                                    size_t granule, void *cookie)
-{
-       mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(iova, size, granule, true, cookie);
+       mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(iova, size, granule, cookie);
        mtk_iommu_tlb_sync(cookie);
   }
@@ -245,7 +237,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_page_nosync(struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather,
   static const struct iommu_flush_ops mtk_iommu_flush_ops = {
        .tlb_flush_all = mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all,
        .tlb_flush_walk = mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_walk,
-       .tlb_flush_leaf = mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_leaf,
+       .tlb_flush_leaf = mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_walk,
        .tlb_add_page = mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_page_nosync,
   };
@@ -475,7 +467,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain,
                spin_lock_irqsave(&dom->pgtlock, flags);
mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(gather->start, length, gather->pgsize,
-                                      false, data);
+                                      data);
        mtk_iommu_tlb_sync(data);
if (!is_in_gather)


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
linux-media...@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek


Reply via email to