On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:15:22AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Using bool on struct is not recommended, as it wastes lots of
> space. So, instead, let's use bits.

Wouldn't "bool b:1;" even be better? I performed a little test:

#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>

struct uints {
        unsigned int a0;
        unsigned int a1;
        unsigned int a2;
        unsigned int a3;
        unsigned int a4;
        unsigned int a5;
        unsigned int a6;
        unsigned int a7;
};

struct bools {
        bool a0;
        bool a1;
        bool a2;
        bool a3;
        bool a4;
        bool a5;
        bool a6;
        bool a7;
};

struct bit_uints {
        unsigned int a0:1;
        unsigned int a1:1;
        unsigned int a2:1;
        unsigned int a3:1;
        unsigned int a4:1;
        unsigned int a5:1;
        unsigned int a6:1;
        unsigned int a7:1;
};

struct bit_bools {
        bool a0:1;
        bool a1:1;
        bool a2:1;
        bool a3:1;
        bool a4:1;
        bool a5:1;
        bool a6:1;
        bool a7:1;
};

int main() {
        printf("bit_uints: %ld\n", sizeof(struct bit_uints));
        printf("bit_bools: %ld\n", sizeof(struct bit_bools));
        printf("uints: %ld\n", sizeof(struct uints));
        printf("bools: %ld\n", sizeof(struct bools));
}

Result:

bit_uints: 4
bit_bools: 1
uints: 32
bools: 8

I know with different types within the struct it looks different, but
still.

g

Reply via email to