In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> In other words, there's no longer any such thing as a "stable" branch. The >> whole point of having separate production and development branches was to have >> one in which each succeeding patch could be counted upon to be more reliable > By your personal definition of stable 2.0.3x is the current stable kernel. Btw: Any chance to see an official 2.0.39 soon? 2.0.39final is out for about half a year now... Christoph -- Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions
Christoph . Hellwig . <hchÀcaldera.de> Fri, 05 Jan 2001 09:12:44 -0800
- Re: Change of policy... Hubert Mantel
- Re: Change of po... Alan Cox
- Re: Change o... Jakob Østergaard
- Re: Cha... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Change of po... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Change o... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Cha... Ingo Molnar
- Re:... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Change of policy for futu... Wayne . Brown
- Re: Change of policy for... Alan Cox
- Re: Change of policy... Christoph . Hellwig . <hchÀcaldera.de>
- Re: Change of po... Alan Cox
- Re: Change of policy for futu... Wayne . Brown
- Re: Change of policy for... Matthew D. Pitts
- Re: Change of policy for futu... Wayne . Brown
- Re: Change of policy for... Nick Holloway
- Re: Change of policy for futu... Wayne . Brown
- Re: Change of policy for... David Weinehall
- Re: Change of policy for futu... Wayne . Brown