On 05 October 2019 00:10, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() is being retired in favor of
> devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(), that behaves similar to
> devm_gpiod_get_index(), but can work with arbitrary firmware node. It
> will also be able to support secondary software nodes.
> 
> Let's switch this driver over.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Adam Thomson <adam.thomson.opensou...@diasemi.com>

> ---
> 
>  drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9211-
> regulator.c
> index bf80748f1ccc..523dc1b95826 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da9211-regulator.c
> @@ -283,12 +283,12 @@ static struct da9211_pdata
> *da9211_parse_regulators_dt(
> 
>               pdata->init_data[n] = da9211_matches[i].init_data;
>               pdata->reg_node[n] = da9211_matches[i].of_node;
> -             pdata->gpiod_ren[n] = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(dev,
> -                               da9211_matches[i].of_node,
> -                               "enable-gpios",
> -                               0,
> -                               GPIOD_OUT_HIGH |
> GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
> -                               "da9211-enable");
> +             pdata->gpiod_ren[n] = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(dev,
> +                                     of_fwnode_handle(pdata-
> >reg_node[n]),
> +                                     "enable",
> +                                     GPIOD_OUT_HIGH |
> +
>       GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
> +                                     "da9211-enable");
>               if (IS_ERR(pdata->gpiod_ren[n]))
>                       pdata->gpiod_ren[n] = NULL;
>               n++;
> --
> 2.23.0.581.g78d2f28ef7-goog

Reply via email to