From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>

commit 480523feae581ab714ba6610388a3b4619a2f695 upstream.

Since commit 4ad23a976413 ("MD: use per-cpu counter for
writes_pending"), set_in_sync() is substantially more expensive: it
can wait for a full RCU grace period which can be 10s of milliseconds.

So we should only call it when the cost is justified.

md_check_recovery() currently calls set_in_sync() every time it finds
anything to do (on non-external active arrays).  For an array
performing resync or recovery, this will be quite often.
Each call will introduce a delay to the md thread, which can noticeable
affect IO submission latency.

In md_check_recovery() we only need to call set_in_sync() if
'safemode' was non-zero at entry, meaning that there has been not
recent IO.  So we save this "safemode was nonzero" state, and only
call set_in_sync() if it was non-zero.

This measurably reduces mean and maximum IO submission latency during
resync/recovery.

Reported-and-tested-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.w...@cloud.ionos.com>
Fixes: 4ad23a976413 ("MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org (v4.12+)
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/md.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8811,6 +8811,7 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mdd
 
        if (mddev_trylock(mddev)) {
                int spares = 0;
+               bool try_set_sync = mddev->safemode != 0;
 
                if (!mddev->external && mddev->safemode == 1)
                        mddev->safemode = 0;
@@ -8856,7 +8857,7 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mdd
                        }
                }
 
-               if (!mddev->external && !mddev->in_sync) {
+               if (try_set_sync && !mddev->external && !mddev->in_sync) {
                        spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
                        set_in_sync(mddev);
                        spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);


Reply via email to