On lunedì 24 settembre 2007, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:57:49PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote: > > Yes, indeed - or sign extension on 64bit machines would set to 1 the > > whole high-word. > > > > But using long for that mask makes no difference; either int or long > > long (or better, either u32 or u64) should be used, given that the > > used signal range is the same on 32 and 64bit machines, it should > > be u32 for normal signals or u64 if RT-signals are also allowed. > > We don't use RT signals for anything, so we could use u32. I wasn't sure of that. > I don't > see it making much difference though. Agreed - the only difference is for cleanliness and easy verification. -- "Doh!" (cit.), I've made another mistake! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
