Hi Yizhuo,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on power-supply/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191002]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yizhuo/power-supply-max17042_battery-fix-some-usage-of-uninitialized-variables/20191003-040948
base:   
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git 
for-next
config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        wget 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O 
~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=sh 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c: In function 
'max17042_load_new_capacity_params':
>> drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:697:10: warning: 'return' with a 
>> value, in function returning void
      return ret;
             ^~~
   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:686:13: note: declared here
    static void max17042_load_new_capacity_params(struct max17042_chip *chip)
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:701:10: warning: 'return' with a 
value, in function returning void
      return ret;
             ^~~
   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:686:13: note: declared here
    static void max17042_load_new_capacity_params(struct max17042_chip *chip)
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/return +697 drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c

   685  
   686  static void max17042_load_new_capacity_params(struct max17042_chip 
*chip)
   687  {
   688          u32 full_cap0, rep_cap, dq_acc, vfSoc;
   689          u32 rem_cap;
   690          int ret;
   691  
   692          struct max17042_config_data *config = chip->pdata->config_data;
   693          struct regmap *map = chip->regmap;
   694  
   695          ret = regmap_read(map, MAX17042_FullCAP0, &full_cap0);
   696          if (ret)
 > 697                  return ret;
   698  
   699          ret = regmap_read(map, MAX17042_VFSOC, &vfSoc);
   700          if (ret)
   701                  return ret;
   702  
   703          /* fg_vfSoc needs to shifted by 8 bits to get the
   704           * perc in 1% accuracy, to get the right rem_cap multiply
   705           * full_cap0, fg_vfSoc and devide by 100
   706           */
   707          rem_cap = ((vfSoc >> 8) * full_cap0) / 100;
   708          max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_RemCap, rem_cap);
   709  
   710          rep_cap = rem_cap;
   711          max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_RepCap, rep_cap);
   712  
   713          /* Write dQ_acc to 200% of Capacity and dP_acc to 200% */
   714          dq_acc = config->fullcap / dQ_ACC_DIV;
   715          max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_dQacc, dq_acc);
   716          max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_dPacc, dP_ACC_200);
   717  
   718          max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_FullCAP,
   719                          config->fullcap);
   720          regmap_write(map, MAX17042_DesignCap,
   721                          config->design_cap);
   722          max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_FullCAPNom,
   723                          config->fullcapnom);
   724          /* Update SOC register with new SOC */
   725          regmap_write(map, MAX17042_RepSOC, vfSoc);
   726  }
   727  

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip

Reply via email to