On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:59:49PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets > > I've not ignored them, as said they were either obviously wrong of offtopic. > > Would the two of you ajourn this debate to alt.flame Better still stop _theorizing_ and start _measuring_ Cheers Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement Alan Cox
- Chris Evans