FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index adc9559..694015d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -342,6 +342,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct
scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
shost->unchecked_isa_dma = sht->unchecked_isa_dma;
shost->use_clustering = sht->use_clustering;
shost->ordered_tag = sht->ordered_tag;
+
+ if (!sht->supported_mode)
+ sht->supported_mode = MODE_INITIATOR;
+
shost->active_mode = sht->supported_mode;
I almost hesitate to speak up, after making the original suggestion, but:
Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for
the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template
members getting modified.
Perhaps this value should instead be mirrored in scsi_host, like many
others?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
