Hi,

On 19-09-25 18:07, Anson Huang wrote:
> The SCU firmware does NOT always have return value stored in message
> header's function element even the API has response data, those special
> APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they should be
> treated as return success always.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>
> ---
>       - This patch is based on the patch of 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11129553/
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c
> index 869be7a..ced5b12 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ static int imx_sc_linux_errmap[IMX_SC_ERR_LAST] = {
>       -EIO,    /* IMX_SC_ERR_FAIL */
>  };
>  
> +static const struct imx_sc_rpc_msg whitelist[] = {
> +     { .svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_MISC, .func = IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_UNIQUE_ID },
> +     { .svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_MISC, .func = 
> IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_GET_BUTTON_STATUS },
> +};

Is this going to be extended in the near future? I see some upcoming
problems here if someone uses a different scu-fw<->kernel combination as
nxp would suggest.

Regards,
  Marco

> +
>  static struct imx_sc_ipc *imx_sc_ipc_handle;
>  
>  static inline int imx_sc_to_linux_errno(int errno)
> @@ -157,11 +162,24 @@ static int imx_scu_ipc_write(struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc, 
> void *msg)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool imx_scu_call_skip_return_value_check(uint8_t svc, uint8_t func)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(whitelist); i++)
> +             if (svc == whitelist[i].svc &&
> +                     func == whitelist[i].func)
> +                     return true;
> +
> +     return false;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * RPC command/response
>   */
>  int imx_scu_call_rpc(struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc, void *msg, bool have_resp)
>  {
> +     uint8_t saved_svc, saved_func;
>       struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr;
>       int ret;
>  
> @@ -171,8 +189,11 @@ int imx_scu_call_rpc(struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc, void 
> *msg, bool have_resp)
>       mutex_lock(&sc_ipc->lock);
>       reinit_completion(&sc_ipc->done);
>  
> -     if (have_resp)
> +     if (have_resp) {
>               sc_ipc->msg = msg;
> +             saved_svc = ((struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *)msg)->svc;
> +             saved_func = ((struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *)msg)->func;
> +     }
>       sc_ipc->count = 0;
>       ret = imx_scu_ipc_write(sc_ipc, msg);
>       if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -190,7 +211,16 @@ int imx_scu_call_rpc(struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc, void 
> *msg, bool have_resp)
>  
>               /* response status is stored in hdr->func field */
>               hdr = msg;
> -             ret = hdr->func;
> +             /*
> +              * Some special SCU firmware APIs do NOT have return value
> +              * in hdr->func, but they do have response data, those special
> +              * APIs are defined as void function in SCU firmware, so they
> +              * should be treated as return success always.
> +              */
> +             if (!imx_scu_call_skip_return_value_check(saved_svc, 
> saved_func))
> +                     ret = hdr->func;
> +             else
> +                     ret = 0;
>       }
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Reply via email to