* tim.b...@sony.com <tim.b...@sony.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ingo Molnar on Sunday, September 22, 2019 1:26 AM
> >
> > * Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:35 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhigg...@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry about that. I am surprised that none of the other reviewers
> > > > brought this up.
> > >
> > > I think I'm "special".
> > >
> > > There was some other similar change a few years ago, which I
> > > absolutely hated because of how it broke autocomplete for me. Very few
> > > other people seemed to react to it.
> >
> > FWIW, I am obsessively sensitive to autocomplete and overall source code
> > file hieararchy and nomenclature details as well, so it's not just you.
> >
> > Beyond the muscle memory aspect, nonsensical naming and inanely flat file
> > hierarchies annoy kernel developers and makes it harder for newbies to
> > understand the kernel source as well.
> >
> > The less clutter, the more organization, the better - and there's very
> > few valid technical reasons to add any new files or directories to the
> > top level directory - we should probably *remove* quite a few.
> >
> > For example 'firmware/' was recently moved to drivers/firmware/, and in a
> > similar fashion about a third of the remaining 22 directories should
> > probably be moved too:
> >
> > drwxr-xr-x arch
> > drwxr-xr-x block
> > drwxr-xr-x certs # move to build/certs/ dir
> > drwxr-xr-x crypto # move to kernel/crypto/ or security/crypto/
> > drwxr-xr-x Documentation
> > drwxr-xr-x drivers
> > drwxr-xr-x fs
> > drwxr-xr-x include
> > drwxr-xr-x init
> > drwxr-xr-x ipc # move to kernel/ipc/
> > drwxr-xr-x kernel
> > drwxr-xr-x lib
> > drwxr-xr-x LICENSES
> > drwxr-xr-x mm
> > drwxr-xr-x net
> > drwxr-xr-x samples # move to Documentation/samples/
> > drwxr-xr-x scripts # move to build/scripts/
>
> This one seems like it would break a lot of workflows, and contributor
> muscle memory and scripts. get_maintainer.pl and checkpatch.pl
> are probably in quite a few people's scripts.
>
> Also, I'm not sure '/build' is the right destination for this. There
> are a lot more things in there than just build scripts. If you really
> want to remove the top level 'scripts', it might be best to put
> the scripts from top-level '/scripts' into '/tools/scripts', which is
> mostly empty now.
Agreed - I'll leave it alone for now, because you are right that it's
widely used.
Thanks,
Ingo
