On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:50:23AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:12 PM Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 07:39:03PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:07 PM Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:05:26PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:19 PM syzbot > > > > > <syzbot+18379f2a19bc62c12...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > syzbot found the following crash on: > > > > > > > > > > > > HEAD commit: a7f89616 Merge branch 'for-5.3-fixes' of > > > > > > git://git.kernel... > > > > > > git tree: upstream > > > > > > console output: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15c33079600000 > > > > > > kernel config: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=861a6f31647968de > > > > > > dashboard link: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=18379f2a19bc62c12565 > > > > > > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental) > > > > > > syz repro: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1066bb85600000 > > > > > > C reproducer: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13e9f75e600000 > > > > > > > > > > > > Bisection is inconclusive: the bug happens on the oldest tested > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > bisection log: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=154d4969600000 > > > > > > final crash: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=174d4969600000 > > > > > > console output: > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=134d4969600000 > > > > > > > > > > > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the > > > > > > commit: > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+18379f2a19bc62c12...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU > > > > > > rcu: 1-...!: (10499 ticks this GP) idle=63a/1/0x4000000000000002 > > > > > > softirq=10978/10978 fqs=0 > > > > > > (t=10501 jiffies g=10601 q=227) > > > > > > rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 10502 jiffies! g10601 f0x0 > > > > > > > > The key point is the above line: RCU's grace-period kthread has not > > > > had a chance to run for 10,502 jiffies. > > > > > > > > > > RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=0 > > > > > > > > And it is sleeping normally. The "RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5)" says that it was > > > > doing a fixed-time wait, which is normally for three jiffies, but never > > > > 10,000 of them. Note that this kthread last ran on CPU 0. > > > > > > > > > > rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: > > > > > > rcu_preempt I29040 10 2 0x80004000 > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:3254 [inline] > > > > > > __schedule+0x755/0x1580 kernel/sched/core.c:3880 > > > > > > schedule+0xd9/0x260 kernel/sched/core.c:3947 > > > > > > schedule_timeout+0x486/0xc50 kernel/time/timer.c:1807 > > > > > > rcu_gp_fqs_loop kernel/rcu/tree.c:1611 [inline] > > > > > > rcu_gp_kthread+0x9b2/0x18c0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1768 > > > > > > kthread+0x361/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:255 > > > > > > ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352 > > > > > > > > This stack trace is expected: The RCU grace-period kthread is doing > > > > a fixed-time wait. Note that this is a stack trace of this kthread, > > > > not necessarily of the CPU it was last running on. > > > > > > > > > > Sending NMI from CPU 1 to CPUs 0: > > > > > > INFO: NMI handler (nmi_cpu_backtrace_handler) took too long to run: > > > > > > 1.403 > > > > > > msecs > > > > > > > > This is surprising. Is this a guest OS? If so, is the vCPU for CPU 0 > > > > stuck somehow? Did it get a SIGSTOP or some such? > > > > > > > > Clearly, if CPU 0 isn't running, RCU's grace-period kthread, which was > > > > last seen on CPU 0, might not be doing so well. > > > > > > > > OK, but we eventually did get a stack trace: > > > > > > > > > > NMI backtrace for cpu 0 > > > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 10344 Comm: syz-executor933 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc8+ #0 > > > > > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, > > > > > > BIOS > > > > > > Google 01/01/2011 > > > > > > RIP: 0010:hhf_dequeue+0x552/0xa20 net/sched/sch_hhf.c:436 > > > > > > Code: ff ff 45 31 ff e9 b0 02 00 00 e8 49 05 ac fb 48 8d 43 f0 41 > > > > > > be 01 00 > > > > > > 00 00 49 8d 95 c0 02 00 00 48 39 c2 74 34 e8 2e 05 ac fb <49> 8d bd > > > > > > ac 03 > > > > > > 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 42 0f b6 14 20 48 89 f8 > > > > > > RSP: 0018:ffff8880ae809038 EFLAGS: 00000206 > > > > > > RAX: ffff8880a3970100 RBX: ffff8880a8b1d538 RCX: ffffffff85c66b39 > > > > > > RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: ffffffff85c66fd2 RDI: 0000000000000005 > > > > > > RBP: ffff8880ae809088 R08: ffff8880a3970100 R09: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > R10: fffffbfff134afaf R11: ffff8880a3970100 R12: dffffc0000000000 > > > > > > R13: ffff8880a8b1d240 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880ae800000(0000) > > > > > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > > > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > > > > CR2: 00000000006dab10 CR3: 0000000008c6d000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 > > > > > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > <IRQ> > > > > > > dequeue_skb net/sched/sch_generic.c:258 [inline] > > > > > > qdisc_restart net/sched/sch_generic.c:361 [inline] > > > > > > __qdisc_run+0x1e7/0x19d0 net/sched/sch_generic.c:379 > > > > > > __dev_xmit_skb net/core/dev.c:3533 [inline] > > > > > > __dev_queue_xmit+0x16f1/0x3650 net/core/dev.c:3838 > > > > > > dev_queue_xmit+0x18/0x20 net/core/dev.c:3902 > > > > > > br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x3f3/0x5c0 net/bridge/br_forward.c:52 > > > > > > NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline] > > > > > > NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:299 [inline] > > > > > > br_forward_finish+0xfa/0x400 net/bridge/br_forward.c:65 > > > > > > NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline] > > > > > > NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:299 [inline] > > > > > > __br_forward+0x641/0xb00 net/bridge/br_forward.c:109 > > > > > > deliver_clone+0x61/0xc0 net/bridge/br_forward.c:125 > > > > > > maybe_deliver+0x2c7/0x390 net/bridge/br_forward.c:181 > > > > > > br_flood+0x13a/0x3d0 net/bridge/br_forward.c:223 > > > > > > br_dev_xmit+0x98c/0x15a0 net/bridge/br_device.c:100 > > > > > > __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4406 [inline] > > > > > > netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4420 [inline] > > > > > > xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3280 [inline] > > > > > > dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1a3/0x9c0 net/core/dev.c:3296 > > > > > > __dev_queue_xmit+0x2b15/0x3650 net/core/dev.c:3869 > > > > > > dev_queue_xmit+0x18/0x20 net/core/dev.c:3902 > > > > > > neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:500 [inline] > > > > > > neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:509 [inline] > > > > > > ip_finish_output2+0x1726/0x2570 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228 > > > > > > __ip_finish_output net/ipv4/ip_output.c:308 [inline] > > > > > > __ip_finish_output+0x5fc/0xb90 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:290 > > > > > > ip_finish_output+0x38/0x1f0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:318 > > > > > > NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:294 [inline] > > > > > > ip_output+0x21f/0x640 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:432 > > > > > > dst_output include/net/dst.h:436 [inline] > > > > > > ip_local_out+0xbb/0x190 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:125 > > > > > > igmpv3_sendpack+0x1b5/0x2c0 net/ipv4/igmp.c:426 > > > > > > igmpv3_send_cr net/ipv4/igmp.c:721 [inline] > > > > > > igmp_ifc_timer_expire+0x687/0xa00 net/ipv4/igmp.c:809 > > > > > > > > So this stack trace leads me to ask if networking has been hogging > > > > the CPU for the past 10,000 jiffies. Perhaps there is a corner case > > > > that is not being addressed by the code that is supposed to move > > > > long-term processing from softirq to ksoftirqd? Or perhaps more > > > > likely, the networking code isn't exiting its softirq handler, thus > > > > preventing the timer softirq handler from running, thus preventing > > > > RCU's grace-period kthread's sleep from ever ending. > > > > > > > > Is this consistent with what you are seeing? > > > > > > > > > This should have been parsed as "INFO: rcu detected stall in > > > > > igmp_ifc_timer_expire" which was already reported: > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=330ce4f7626354cc6444c457c9a5e82d8a8c5055 > > > > > So let's do: > > > > > #syz fix: sch_hhf: ensure quantum and hhf_non_hh_weight are non-zero > > > > > > > > > > +Paul, Tetsuo > > > > > > > > > > However, I cannot make sense of this kernel output (nor syzbot). > > > > > Here is full console output: > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15c33079600000 > > > > > > > > I will bite... What are all the "executing program" outputs? > > > > > > > > > This is "self-detected stall" which was detected in rcu_gp_kthread (? > > > > > usually these are detected in interrupts, no?) > > > > > > > > They are detected by the scheduling-clock interrupt handler, but > > > > stalls can be generated both at process and at interrupt levels. > > > > > > > > > and then the kthread runs on CPU 1 on top of the igmp_ifc_timer_expire > > > > > handler running in an interrupt (how can a kthread run on the > > > > > interrupt stack?) > > > > > and then it does NMI traceback for CPU 0, but that runs on CPU 1 > > > > > (shouldn't NMI traceback run on CPU 0 too?) > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas what exactly happened here and how one can make sense of > > > > > such output to attribute it to some kernel activity that caused the > > > > > stall? > > > > > > > > My best guess based on what I am seeing is that a softirq handler > > > > is running for about ten seconds, which is too long. > > > > > > > > Do you have means for tracking softirq-handler durations? > > > > > > The "executing program" are produced by userspace. Kernel and > > > userspace outputs are multiplexed later to restore order of events. > > > Kernel output is prefixed with "[ 351.648071][ C1]". > > > > > > Yes, the networking is stuck dead in an infinite loop. That's a known > > > bug, already fixed by: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d4d6ec6dac07f263f06d847d6f732d6855522845 > > > > > > But I am interested why this report looks not like all other rcu > > > stalls and who should be the parsing logic to conclude that the stall > > > happened in igmp_ifc_timer_expire? > > > > Because the infinite loop happened to prevent the RCU grace-period > > kthread from making progress. The odds of that are a bit low, so > > most of the stall warnings would look different. > > But isn't it happens in all cases of infinite loops? Yet most other > reports look different and don't mention kthread. What's different > here?
The difference is that in this case the infinite loop just happened to interrupt the actual execution of the specific kthread named rcu_preempt. > Or is it another case of flaky reporting? We had that other case where > self-stall or remote-stall had the same timeout, so were reported > non-deterministically, or worse intermixed at the same time. The bug manifested in a different way, so it looks different. > > I do expect to be revisiting the RCU CPU stall warning logic at some > > point. Or are you asking how you could modify a script that figures > > this out? > > Both. Fixing parsing may be easier and will fix all old kernels too. > You know nobody uses kernel HEAD, people use down to 3.18 and maybe > older. You are not going to backport these changes all the way back, > right? :) Not for something like this, no, backporting would introduce more risk than benefit. But time does pass and people do eventually move forward, for varying values of "eventually". ;-) > > > Why it's detected by the kthread? > > > > It is not detected by the kthread. The kthread has been interrupted > > indefinitely by the softirq processing, so is not in a position to > > detect much of anything. It is instead detected as usual by the > > scheduling-clock interrupt. > > I don't see any rcu-liveness-checking interrupt handler in any > tracebacks. Where is it? Is it useful to traceback the ktread in such > case at all? It is the scheduling-clock interrupt, which invokes an RCU hook that does the checking. AKA apic_timer_interrupt for many x86 systems. > What we do is the following, we find first apic_timer_interrupt on the > current CPU (presumably that the rcu-health-checking interrupt) and > then take the next "anchor" frame after that. This does not work in > this case, because the rcu-health-checking interrupt in missing. In current kernels, you would be looking for rcu_sched_clock_irq(), which calls rcu_pending() which is often inlined which calls check_cpu_stall(), which can also be inlined. In older kernels, rcu_sched_clock_irq() is instead called rcu_check_callbacks() and you might see __rcu_pending() instead of rcu_pending(). And yes, that stack looked truncated. > > What is different is that the scheduling-clock interrupt detected > > that the grace-period kthread had not been running for an extended > > period of time. It can detect this because the grace period kthread > > stores timestamps before each activity it undertakes. > > > > > How it runs on top of an interrupt? > > > > It is not running on top of an interrupt. Its stack was dumped > > separately. > > I see. Usually the first stack is the traceback of the current stack. > So I was confused. Yes, when you see the "starved" message, the next stack is that of the RCU grace-period kthread. > > > And why one cpu tracebacks another one? > > > > The usual reason is because neither CPU's quiescent state was reported > > to the RCU core, so the stall-warning code dumped both stacks. > > But should the other CPU traceback _itself_? Rather than being traced > back by another CPU? > E.g. see this report: > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/pkg/report/testdata/linux/report/350#L61-L83 > Here the overall problem was detected by C2, but then C1 traces back itself. > > ... however even in that case C0 and C3 are traced by C2: > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/pkg/report/testdata/linux/report/350#L84-L149 > I can't understand this... > This makes understanding what happened harder because it's not easy to > exclude things on other CPUs. It would be in CPU-number order, normally. Given that CPU 0's stack dump seems to have been truncated, might CPU 1's stack have been lost entirely? But this is something that I should be able to fix, give or take architecture constraints. In most cases, I should be able to dump the self-detecting CPU's stack first, then sequence through the others. Would that help? > > My turn. Why dothere appear to be multiple levels of interrupt, as > > in one interrupt interrupting another interrupt? > > I don't understand the question. > I see 1 apic_timer_interrupt on CPU 0 and 1 apic_timer_interrupt on CPU 1. Ah, I was confused by the "Code: Bad RIP value." and subsequent register dump, and failed to see the immediately following "NMI backtrace for cpu 1": [ 351.815741][ C1] NMI backtrace for cpu 1 [ 352.590657][ C1] CPU: 1 PID: 10345 Comm: syz-executor933 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc8+ #0 [ 352.598782][ C1] Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 [ 352.609011][ C1] Call Trace: [ 352.612468][ C1] <IRQ> [ 352.615577][ C1] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 [ 352.620089][ C1] nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x70/0xb2 [ 352.625376][ C1] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x16/0x20 [ 352.631787][ C1] ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu.cold+0x45/0x45 [ 352.637425][ C1] nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x23b/0x28b [ 352.643685][ C1] arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x14/0x20 [ 352.649832][ C1] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x183/0x1cf [ 352.654949][ C1] rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x4dd/0xc13 The above is the scheduling-clock hook for RCU. It looks like rcu_pending() and check_cpu_stall() have been inlined or tail-optimized or whatever. [ 352.660584][ C1] ? raise_softirq+0x138/0x340 [ 352.665357][ C1] update_process_times+0x32/0x80 [ 352.670564][ C1] tick_sched_handle+0xa2/0x190 [ 352.675822][ C1] tick_sched_timer+0x53/0x140 [ 352.680592][ C1] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x364/0xe40 [ 352.686112][ C1] ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 352.691403][ C1] ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0xcb0/0xcb0 [ 352.697161][ C1] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp4+0x16/0x20 [ 352.704973][ C1] ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x2d3/0x440 [ 352.711269][ C1] hrtimer_interrupt+0x314/0x770 [ 352.716225][ C1] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x160/0x610 [ 352.721907][ C1] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 352.727454][ C1] </IRQ> [ 352.730759][ C1] RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x132/0x9f0 [ 352.737876][ C1] Code: 00 00 00 48 8b 45 d0 65 48 33 04 25 28 00 00 00 0f 85 37 07 00 00 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 f3 90 <e9> 73 ff ff ff 8b 45 98 4c 8d 65 d8 3d 00 01 00 00 0f 84 e5 00 00 [ 352.757777][ C1] RSP: 0018:ffff8880946ef2f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 [ 352.766276][ C1] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880a8b1d328 RCX: ffffffff81595c17 [ 352.774247][ C1] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff8880a8b1d328 [ 352.782332][ C1] RBP: ffff8880946ef3b8 R08: 1ffff11015163a65 R09: ffffed1015163a66 [ 352.790301][ C1] R10: ffffed1015163a65 R11: ffff8880a8b1d32b R12: 0000000000000001 [ 352.798893][ C1] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: ffffed1015163a65 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 352.807058][ C1] ? native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xb7/0x9f0 [ 352.813663][ C1] ? native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xb7/0x9f0 [ 352.820078][ C1] ? __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xd10/0xd10 [ 352.826443][ C1] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x16/0x20 [ 352.832775][ C1] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x2d0/0x1ed0 [ 352.838239][ C1] ? mark_held_locks+0xf0/0xf0 [ 352.843008][ C1] do_raw_spin_lock+0x20e/0x2e0 [ 352.847950][ C1] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [ 352.852887][ C1] ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 [ 352.857741][ C1] ? hhf_change+0x2e3/0xad0 (And so on.) > > > As of now syzkaller parsed it as "in sys_exit_group", which lead to > > > the creation of a new bug and another email, which is suboptimal. > > > > I suggest having syzkaller look for something like "rcu: rcu_[a-z]* > > kthread starved for". > > And then what do we need to do to detect this as "in igmp_ifc_timer_expire"? Skip the first stack dump in this case, anyway. Then see the igmp_ifc_timer_expire() in the CPU 1 stack dump. But of course, bugs can do whatever they want, so given any bug-detection strategy, there will be a bug that defeats that strategy. But you knew that already. ;-) Thanx, Paul > > I don't have advice for handling the apparent > > multiple levels of interrupt. > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > > > > > call_timer_fn+0x1ac/0x780 kernel/time/timer.c:1322 > > > > > > expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1366 [inline] > > > > > > __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1685 [inline] > > > > > > __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1653 [inline] > > > > > > run_timer_softirq+0x697/0x17a0 kernel/time/timer.c:1698 > > > > > > __do_softirq+0x262/0x98c kernel/softirq.c:292 > > > > > > invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:373 [inline] > > > > > > irq_exit+0x19b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:413 > > > > > > exiting_irq arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:537 [inline] > > > > > > smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a3/0x610 > > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1137 > > > > > > apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:830 > > > > > > </IRQ> > > > > > > RIP: 0010:__raw_write_unlock_irq include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:268 > > > > > > [inline] > > > > > > RIP: 0010:_raw_write_unlock_irq+0x54/0x90 > > > > > > kernel/locking/spinlock.c:343 > > > > > > Code: c0 60 f4 d2 88 48 ba 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 e8 03 80 > > > > > > 3c 10 00 > > > > > > 75 33 48 83 3d 05 bf 94 01 00 74 20 fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <bf> 01 00 > > > > > > 00 00 > > > > > > e8 62 8c 10 fa 65 8b 05 93 c8 c3 78 85 c0 74 06 41 > > > > > > RSP: 0018:ffff8880a406fd70 EFLAGS: 00000282 ORIG_RAX: > > > > > > ffffffffffffff13 > > > > > > RAX: 1ffffffff11a5e8c RBX: ffff88809fbda740 RCX: 1ffffffff134b5ee > > > > > > RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff8177f15e RDI: ffffffff873e3538 > > > > > > RBP: ffff8880a406fd78 R08: ffff8880a3970100 R09: fffffbfff134afb0 > > > > > > R10: fffffbfff134afaf R11: ffffffff89a57d7f R12: ffffffff88c090c0 > > > > > > R13: 0000000000000011 R14: ffff8880a3970100 R15: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > exit_notify kernel/exit.c:745 [inline] > > > > > > do_exit+0x13ab/0x2e50 kernel/exit.c:900 > > > > > > do_group_exit+0x135/0x360 kernel/exit.c:983 > > > > > > __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:994 [inline] > > > > > > __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:992 [inline] > > > > > > __x64_sys_exit_group+0x44/0x50 kernel/exit.c:992 > > > > > > do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x6a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296 > > > > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > > > > > > RIP: 0033:0x440f88 > > > > > > Code: Bad RIP value. > > > > > > RSP: 002b:00007ffe302d02b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: > > > > > > 00000000000000e7 > > > > > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000440f88 > > > > > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > RBP: 00000000004c6eb0 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffd0 > > > > > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 > > > > > > R13: 00000000006d95e0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > NMI backtrace for cpu 1 > > > > > > CPU: 1 PID: 10345 Comm: syz-executor933 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc8+ #0 > > > > > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, > > > > > > BIOS > > > > > > Google 01/01/2011 > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > <IRQ> > > > > > > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] > > > > > > dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 > > > > > > nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x70/0xb2 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:101 > > > > > > nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x23b/0x28b lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 > > > > > > arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x14/0x20 > > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:38 > > > > > > trigger_single_cpu_backtrace include/linux/nmi.h:164 [inline] > > > > > > rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x183/0x1cf kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:254 > > > > > > print_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:455 [inline] > > > > > > check_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:529 [inline] > > > > > > rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:2736 [inline] > > > > > > rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x4dd/0xc13 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2183 > > > > > > update_process_times+0x32/0x80 kernel/time/timer.c:1639 > > > > > > tick_sched_handle+0xa2/0x190 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:167 > > > > > > tick_sched_timer+0x53/0x140 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1296 > > > > > > __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1389 [inline] > > > > > > __hrtimer_run_queues+0x364/0xe40 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1451 > > > > > > hrtimer_interrupt+0x314/0x770 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1509 > > > > > > local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1110 > > > > > > [inline] > > > > > > smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x160/0x610 > > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1135 > > > > > > apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:830 > > > > > > </IRQ> > > > > > > RIP: 0010:cpu_relax arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:656 [inline] > > > > > > RIP: 0010:virt_spin_lock arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:84 > > > > > > [inline] > > > > > > RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x132/0x9f0 > > > > > > kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:325 > > > > > > Code: 00 00 00 48 8b 45 d0 65 48 33 04 25 28 00 00 00 0f 85 37 07 > > > > > > 00 00 48 > > > > > > 81 c4 98 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 f3 90 <e9> 73 ff > > > > > > ff ff > > > > > > 8b 45 98 4c 8d 65 d8 3d 00 01 00 00 0f 84 e5 00 00 > > > > > > RSP: 0018:ffff8880946ef2f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: > > > > > > ffffffffffffff13 > > > > > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880a8b1d328 RCX: ffffffff81595c17 > > > > > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff8880a8b1d328 > > > > > > RBP: ffff8880946ef3b8 R08: 1ffff11015163a65 R09: ffffed1015163a66 > > > > > > R10: ffffed1015163a65 R11: ffff8880a8b1d32b R12: 0000000000000001 > > > > > > R13: 0000000000000003 R14: ffffed1015163a65 R15: 0000000000000001 > > > > > > pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:654 > > > > > > [inline] > > > > > > queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:50 > > > > > > [inline] > > > > > > queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:81 [inline] > > > > > > do_raw_spin_lock+0x20e/0x2e0 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:113 > > > > > > __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136 [inline] > > > > > > _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3b/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:175 > > > > > > spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:343 [inline] > > > > > > sch_tree_lock include/net/sch_generic.h:570 [inline] > > > > > > hhf_change+0x2e3/0xad0 net/sched/sch_hhf.c:537 > > > > > > qdisc_change net/sched/sch_api.c:1321 [inline] > > > > > > tc_modify_qdisc+0xfcf/0x1c50 net/sched/sch_api.c:1623 > > > > > > rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x463/0xb00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5223 > > > > > > netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x450 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2477 > > > > > > rtnetlink_rcv+0x1d/0x30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5241 > > > > > > netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1302 [inline] > > > > > > netlink_unicast+0x531/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1328 > > > > > > netlink_sendmsg+0x8a5/0xd60 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1917 > > > > > > sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:637 [inline] > > > > > > sock_sendmsg+0xd7/0x130 net/socket.c:657 > > > > > > ___sys_sendmsg+0x803/0x920 net/socket.c:2311 > > > > > > __sys_sendmsg+0x105/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2356 > > > > > > __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2365 [inline] > > > > > > __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2363 [inline] > > > > > > __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 net/socket.c:2363 > > > > > > do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x6a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296 > > > > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > > > > > > RIP: 0033:0x442399 > > > > > > Code: e8 9c 07 03 00 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 > > > > > > 48 89 f7 > > > > > > 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 > > > > > > f0 ff > > > > > > ff 0f 83 3b 0a fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 > > > > > > RSP: 002b:00007ffe302d02f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: > > > > > > 000000000000002e > > > > > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000442399 > > > > > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000003 > > > > > > RBP: 000000000003c361 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > R13: 00000000004032f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > > > > > > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > > > > > > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkal...@googlegroups.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See: > > > > > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > > > > > > For information about bisection process see: > > > > > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection > > > > > > syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see: > > > > > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > > Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > > > > > > send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/000000000000674b3d0592d2015b%40google.com. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > > > an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/20190919170750.GO30224%40paulmck-ThinkPad-P72. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "syzkaller-bugs" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/20190919201200.GP30224%40paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.
