Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>> Please, try with this patch too:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
>>> index c0fe71a..f599508 100644
>>> --- a/fs/locks.c
>>> +++ b/fs/locks.c
>>> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp,
>>> locks_copy_lock(new_fl, lease);
>>> locks_insert_lock(before, new_fl);
>>>
>>> - *flp = fl;
>>> + *flp = new_fl;
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> out:
>>>
>> Hi, Pavel,
>>
>> You did not signoff on the patch.
>
> I did not, but this is just a patch to test. I know, that it
> most likely fixes the problem, but since Kamalesh didn't tell
> us how he had triggered it, I'd like him to Ack it :)
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
>
Ok, just wanted to let you know in case you missed it out.
In case Andrew picked it up. That's all!
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
