On 9/11/19 11:58 AM, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
After a transfer timeout, some faulty I2C slave devices might hold down
the SCL or the SDA pins. We can generate a bus clear command, hoping that
the slave might release the pins.

Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com>
---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.h        |  6 +++++-
  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c 
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c
index a3fcc35ffd3b..5f544a16db96 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c
@@ -599,6 +599,26 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
                at91_twi_write(dev, AT91_TWI_CR,
                               AT91_TWI_THRCLR | AT91_TWI_LOCKCLR);
        }
+
+       /*
+        * After timeout, some faulty I2C slave devices might hold SCL/SDA down;
+        * we can send a bus clear command, hoping that the pins will be
+        * released
+        */
+       if (!(dev->transfer_status & AT91_TWI_SDA) ||
+           !(dev->transfer_status & AT91_TWI_SCL)) {
+               dev_dbg(dev->dev,
+                       "SDA/SCL are down; sending bus clear command\n");
+               if (dev->use_alt_cmd) {
+                       unsigned int acr;
+
+                       acr = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_ACR);
+                       acr &= ~AT91_TWI_ACR_DATAL_MASK;
+                       at91_twi_write(dev, AT91_TWI_ACR, acr);
+               }
+               at91_twi_write(dev, AT91_TWI_CR, AT91_TWI_CLEAR);

This bit is not documented on SoCs before SAMA5D2/D4, this write shouldn't be done unconditionally.


--
Kamel Bouhara, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Reply via email to