On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote: > Together with the idea of not allowing multiple lines in the kprint_xxx > functions, that would go with our approach having message numbers to > identify a message.
How does this equate/give message numbers? > If you do it like that, you can't support "%s", since then you would > store only the pointer and not the whole string. I think, that we can't > live without %s. long long would not work either. Perhaps it's better to scan the format string or indirect the printk formatting logic. Another possibility: An added pass between gcc preprocessor and compiler could compact or compress the format string without modifying the conversion specifications so __attribute__ ((format (printf)) would still work. printk could expand the compacted/compressed format. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
