On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:09:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > Please kill lib-y while you're at it. It's useless and a constant > > > source of pain like this. > > Kernel-bloat is another "constant source of pain". > > But the troubles are that increased blot does not result in compiler erros. > > > > And your proposal to kil lib-y is a counter-act here. > > Killing lib-y doesn't create kernel bloat if done right. Just introduce > proper Kconfig dependencies for the truely optional parts. But if you > look at the list of objects in lib-y you'll see that they fall in basically > three categories: > > (1) always used by core code - should be obj-y > (2) generic implementation for arch-specific functionality, should be > guarded by Kconfig for clarity reasons anyway > (3) library code often but not always used by code that's not always > built in. Here we run into the move to obj-y to avoid compiler > warning when used as module issue all the time. Adding a CONFIG > for the bigger onces actually avoids bloat over obj-y here, and > when it's small enough obj-y is a lot safer in the presence of > modular users > > Really, trying to use the old static library use on demand concept simply > doesn't fit the way the kernel is built with it's modules and dependencies.
I objected to just killing lib-y (the way I read your original proposal). If we introduce proper kconfig dependencies as in (3) then I am all for it. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/