On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:40:07 +1000 hce wrote: > Thanks Randy. > > On 9/24/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:52:36 +1000 hce wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am upgrading from kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.22 on ARM S3C2400A and found > > > a following issue on 2.6.22. > > > > > > On 2.6.11, I selected CONFIG_ISA, CONFIG_NET_PCI and CONFIG_CS89X0 to > > > build CS8900A Ethernet driver to kernel, it was running perfect. > > > > > > But on 2.6.22, I made the same configuration for CS8900A, the cs89x0.o > > > could not be compiled in to the kernel (or as a module when I tried to > > > CONFIG_CS89X0=m) unless I commented out depends statement in > > > drivers/net/Kconfig. I double checked all three are CONFIG_ISA=y, > > > CONFIG_NET_PCI=y and CONFIG_CS89X0=y. Any explanation please, was I > > > missing something here? > > > > I didn't look in 2.6.11 Kconfig files, but in 2.6.22, this driver is > > limited to 3 specific boards: > > > > config CS89x0 > > tristate "CS89x0 support" > > depends on NET_PCI && (ISA || MACH_IXDP2351 || ARCH_IXDP2X01 || > > ARCH_PNX010X) > > The Kconfig for CS89x0 in 2.6.11 is exactly the same as 2.6.22. > > > Does ARM S3C2400A qualify as any of those? (MACH_... or ARCH_...) > > I can run CS89x0 for ARM S3C2400 in 2.6.11, at least I can say yes, > the ARM S3C2400A qualifies those in 2.6.11, I don't know the 2.6.22 > and I hope someone knows 2.6.22 well can answer it. > > > (latter: ARCH_PNX010X is not used anywhere else AFAICT) > > Yes, but you only need to enable ISA and NET_PCI to use CS89x0.
Right. I don't have any problem building CS89x0 for X86_32: make defconfig then enable ISA (what!?!? why not in defconfig?) and then enable CS89x0. Please send your .config file. --- ~Randy Phaedrus says that Quality is about caring. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
