* Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:22:28 +0300 * Organization: Home [] >> > >> > So there, if one wants "ATI Radeon display support" on Radeon XPRESS >> > 200M with >> > X using radeon_drv.so, *should* put "Framebuffer Console support" to N >> > (if it's >> > not already). [] > Bottom line: no radeonfb for me :( at least, not now; but I have to be > honest with > you: I don't see what commit dd1447134454b169d5ae353aceb93f2368db8547 > brought new > into the picture. The previous radeonfb worked just great, but then, again, > maybe I'm > not using the console at it's full power :)
In fact, it's known statement, that there must only one hardware driver for graphic adapter. Be it framebuffer with X fb driver on it or legacy VGA text and X with its driver.so and 3D stuff. (i choose legacy text without X for the most of my time, though :) _____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
