On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:44:21 +0300
Stefan Popa <stefan.p...@analog.com> wrote:

> One in two sample sets was lost by multiplying fifo_set_size with
> sizeof(u16). Also, the double number of available samples were pushed to
> the iio buffers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa <stefan.p...@analog.com>
Applied with same fixes tag as previous and cc stable.

> ---
> Changes in v2:
>       - Nothing changed.
> 
>  drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> index 7de5e1b..33edca8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> @@ -553,8 +553,7 @@ static irqreturn_t adxl372_trigger_handler(int irq, void  
> *p)
>                       goto err;
>  
>               /* Each sample is 2 bytes */
> -             for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries * sizeof(u16);
> -                  i += st->fifo_set_size * sizeof(u16))
> +             for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries; i += st->fifo_set_size)
>                       iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, &st->fifo_buf[i]);
>       }
>  err:

Reply via email to