Hi, On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:31:12PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > BTW, what inumber do you want for whiteouts? IIRC, we decided to use > the same entry type as UFS does (14), but I don't remember what was > the decision on inumber. UFS uses 1 for them, is it OK with you? 0 is used for padding, so 1 makes sense, yes. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] ext2_new_block() behaviour Andreas Dilger
- Re: [RFC] ext2_new_block() behaviour Alexander Viro
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_block() be... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_block(... Alexander Viro
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Alexander Viro
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Alexander Viro
- -bird tree Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_bl... Stephen C. Tweedie