Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2019-08-26 09:45:07)
> @@ -61,6 +63,16 @@ static int qcom_apcs_msm8916_clk_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>         if (!a53cc)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +       /* legacy bindings only defined the pll parent clock (index = 0) with 
> no

Another nitpick: This is wrong multi-line comment style. SHould be a
bare /* on this line.

> +        * name; when both of the parents are specified in the bindings, the
> +        * pll is the second one (index = 1).
> +        */

Reply via email to