On 9/4/19 6:44 PM, Julien Desfossez wrote:
>@@ -3853,7 +3880,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, >struct rq_flags *rf) > goto done; > } > >- if (!is_idle_task(p)) >+ if (!is_force_idle_task(p)) Should this be if (!is_core_idle_task(p)) instead? > occ++; > Tim