On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > You always put boring, crappy, insufficient text in the for-the-changelog > section and interesting, useful, sufficient text in the not-for-the-changelog > section.
I'll swap the sections in the future then. ;-) Frankly I was not sure whether the changelog was happy about being fed with lengthy explanations and it has not spoken out. I have to admit this is a habit carried over from the FSF-style ChangeLog -- where the enforced rule is actually *not* to provide any explanation for why changes are done and only describe what has been modified (with any discussion around archived in the respective mailing list). > But you can't fool me! I have an editor and I fix it up. Thank you and sorry for the extra work I caused you -- I shall keep your suggestion in mind in the future. Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
