On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:25:59 +0200
Viktor Rosendahl <viktor.rosend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +void latency_fsnotify_stop(void)
> +{
> + /* Make sure all CPUs see caller's previous actions to stop tracer */
> + smp_wmb();
These memory barriers just look wrong. What exactly are you trying to protect
here?
Where's the matching rmbs?
-- Steve
> + static_branch_disable(&latency_notify_key);
> + latency_fsnotify_process();
> +}
> +
> +void latency_fsnotify_start(void)
> +{
> + static_branch_enable(&latency_notify_key);
> + /* Make sure all CPUs see key value before caller continue */
> + smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
