On Tuesday, September 18, 2007 2:53 am Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:21:47AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > I can confirm this is an add-in graphics card. the bfd is 00:02.0, > > so it's not behind any AGP/PCI-E bridge. > > AFAIKS, 00:02.0 is *integrated* controller. Can you check that > "graphic adapter priority" setting in BIOS is "PCI Express" and not > "Internal VGA"? In the latter case an add-on card might be turned > completely off, so it doesn't even show up in lspci output.
Yeah, it's integrated gfx. See the PRM at intel.com for the decode rules. I've been following this thread and I see a lot of fear about moving to probing BARs as outlined in the PCI spec. I haven't seen much in the way of hard evidence though, mostly just handwaving or red herrings (and even one comment implying that -mm wasn't a real testbed for patches) that don't have much to do with the actual "disable, size, re-enable" logic. Has a conclusion been reached yet? Keep in mind that any failures that occur due to this patch should be easy to track down (boot hang), but we have yet to see any in real life. Moreover, reversion is trivial, and we could move to a more complex scheme at that time if needed, but why bother unless we're sure we need to? Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
