On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:39:18 +0200 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@collabora.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:00:44 +0000 > Vitor Soares <vitor.soa...@synopsys.com> wrote: > > > Hi Boris, > > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@collabora.com> > > Date: Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:44:57 > > > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:19:33 +0200 > > > Vitor Soares <vitor.soa...@synopsys.com> wrote: > > > > > > > The I3C devices described in DT might not be attached to the master > > > > which > > > > doesn't allow to assign a specific dynamic address. > > > > > > I remember testing this when developing the framework, so, unless > > > another patch regressed it, it should already work. I suspect patch 1 > > > is actually the regressing this use case. > > > > For today it doesn't address the case where the device is described with > > static address = 0, which isn't attached to the controller. > > Hm, I'm pretty sure I had designed the code to support that case (see > [1]). It might be buggy, but nothing we can't fix I guess. > [1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3-rc6/source/drivers/i3c/master.c#L1898
