On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 17:28, Rik van Riel <r...@surriel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 15:53 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 04:18, Rik van Riel <r...@surriel.com> wrote: > > > Use an explicit "cfs_rq of parent sched_entity" helper in a few > > > strategic places, where cfs_rq_of(se) may no longer point at the > > > > The only case is the sched_entity of a task which will point to root > > cfs, isn't it ? > > True. I am more than open to ideas to simplify this > part of the code, hopefully in some way that makes > it easier to read.
my question was mainly informative to make sure that i didn't miss a corner case > > -- > All Rights Reversed.
