On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:34:00 -0700 Andrew Morton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, it was an optimisation. spin_lock() implies rcu_read_lock(). That's > > a bit dirty and we might choose to not do that. > > Not true for the preemptible-rcu work. All such sites should be fixed, > or at the very least heavily annotated.
What he said!!! Thanx, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/