On 09/18/2007 04:07 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:47:31AM +0200, Oliver Falk wrote: >> On 09/17/2007 11:41 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:07PM +0200, Oliver Falk wrote: >>>> Hi! >>> Hi Oliver! >>> >>>> ... >>>> As these additions are quite new to upstream kernel, but at Alphacore we >>>> have patched it since a while now (I don't know about other Alpha ports; >>>> Debian folks may speak up now!), I would suggest to use the same >>>> 'ordering' of the syscalls upstream and add the new syscalls that we had >>>> not in place, but are now upstream to the end of our 'old' list. >>>> ... >>> I just checked: >>> >>> It seems Debian didn't patch them into the kernel at all, and since two >>> months Debian unstable ships kernel 2.6.22 with the upstream syscall >>> numbers. >> That's possible a problem. Right. Someone with contacts to Debian here? >> If Debian hasn't rebuilt glibc against the new headers, we could change >> it without problems. >> ... > > According to the Debian auto-builder database [1], the Alpha glibc > package in Debian unstable has been rebuilt 8 times since the 2.6.22 > kernel packages entered Debian unstable. > > And it's not only Debian, at least Gentoo also offers an Alpha port.
Well. As I said. I'll step back and let it be as it is. Debian was to fast. :-) -of - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
