On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:54:59 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > It increases the lock hold times though. Otoh it might work out with the > > lock placement. > > Yeah may be good for NUMA. Might, I'd just like a _little_ justification for an extra tunable. > > Do you have any numbers that show this is worthwhile? > > Tried to run AIM7 but the improvements are in the noise. I need a tests > that really does large memory allocation and stresses the LRU. I could > code something up but then Lee's patch addresses some of the same issues. > Is there any standard test that shows LRU handling regressions? hehe, I wish. I was just hoping you'd done this patch as a result of an actual problem and not a hunch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
