Hi Boris, 

> > +
> > +static int  mxic_nfc_wait_ready(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > +   struct mxic_nand_ctlr *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> > +   u32 sts;
> > +
> > +   return readl_poll_timeout(nfc->regs + INT_STS, sts,
> > +              sts & INT_RDY_PIN, 0, USEC_PER_SEC);
> 
> You're not using interrupts at all? For things like R/B wait it's
> usually a good thing to rely on interrupts instead of status-polling.
> 

Have updated it and I will patch using interrupts instead of polling.

thanks for your comments.

best regards,
Mason



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information 
and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be 
reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail 
(and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as 
well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be 
informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is 
prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. 
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================



============================================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and/or 
personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be reminded that 
duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail (and/or its 
attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in 
error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as well as its 
attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be informed that 
collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited unless 
expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for your 
attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================

Reply via email to