From: Wanpeng Li <wanpen...@tencent.com>

commit 17e433b54393a6269acbcb792da97791fe1592d8 upstream.

After commit d73eb57b80b (KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts), a
five years old bug is exposed. Running ebizzy benchmark in three 80 vCPUs VMs
on one 80 pCPUs Skylake server, a lot of rcu_sched stall warning splatting
in the VMs after stress testing:

 INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 4 41 57 62 77} (detected by 
15, t=60004 jiffies, g=899, c=898, q=15073)
 Call Trace:
   flush_tlb_mm_range+0x68/0x140
   tlb_flush_mmu.part.75+0x37/0xe0
   tlb_finish_mmu+0x55/0x60
   zap_page_range+0x142/0x190
   SyS_madvise+0x3cd/0x9c0
   system_call_fastpath+0x1c/0x21

swait_active() sustains to be true before finish_swait() is called in
kvm_vcpu_block(), voluntarily preempted vCPUs are taken into account
by kvm_vcpu_on_spin() loop greatly increases the probability condition
kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) is checked and can be true, when APICv
is enabled the yield-candidate vCPU's VMCS RVI field leaks(by
vmx_sync_pir_to_irr()) into spinning-on-a-taken-lock vCPU's current
VMCS.

This patch fixes it by checking conservatively a subset of events.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 98f4a1467 (KVM: add kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() test to kvm_vcpu_on_spin() 
loop)
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpen...@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c      |    5 +++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              |    6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |    6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/kvm_host.h        |    1 +
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 7 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vc
        return !!(v->arch.pending_exceptions) || kvm_request_pending(v);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       return kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu);
+}
+
 bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
        return false;
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1077,6 +1077,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
        int (*update_pi_irte)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
                              uint32_t guest_irq, bool set);
        void (*apicv_post_state_restore)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+       bool (*dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
        int (*set_hv_timer)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_deadline_tsc);
        void (*cancel_hv_timer)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -4637,6 +4637,11 @@ static void svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct
                kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
 }
 
+static bool svm_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       return false;
+}
+
 static void svm_ir_list_del(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct amd_iommu_pi_data *pi)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
@@ -5746,6 +5751,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __
 
        .pmu_ops = &amd_pmu_ops,
        .deliver_posted_interrupt = svm_deliver_avic_intr,
+       .dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt = svm_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt,
        .update_pi_irte = svm_update_pi_irte,
        .setup_mce = svm_setup_mce,
 };
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -9431,6 +9431,11 @@ static int vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kv
        return max_irr;
 }
 
+static bool vmx_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       return pi_test_on(vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu));
+}
+
 static void vmx_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap)
 {
        if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
@@ -12756,6 +12761,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __
        .hwapic_isr_update = vmx_hwapic_isr_update,
        .sync_pir_to_irr = vmx_sync_pir_to_irr,
        .deliver_posted_interrupt = vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt,
+       .dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt = vmx_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt,
 
        .set_tss_addr = vmx_set_tss_addr,
        .get_tdp_level = get_ept_level,
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8711,6 +8711,22 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vc
        return kvm_vcpu_running(vcpu) || kvm_vcpu_has_events(vcpu);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       if (READ_ONCE(vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted))
+               return true;
+
+       if (kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_NMI, vcpu) ||
+               kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu) ||
+                kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu))
+               return true;
+
+       if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active && 
kvm_x86_ops->dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(vcpu))
+               return true;
+
+       return false;
+}
+
 bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
        return vcpu->arch.preempted_in_kernel;
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -808,6 +808,7 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(voi
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 #ifndef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC
 static inline struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void)
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2314,6 +2314,29 @@ static bool kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_direct
 #endif
 }
 
+/*
+ * Unlike kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable, this function is called outside
+ * a vcpu_load/vcpu_put pair.  However, for most architectures
+ * kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable does not require vcpu_load.
+ */
+bool __weak kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       return kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu);
+}
+
+static bool vcpu_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       if (kvm_arch_dy_runnable(vcpu))
+               return true;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF
+       if (!list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done))
+               return true;
+#endif
+
+       return false;
+}
+
 void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool yield_to_kernel_mode)
 {
        struct kvm *kvm = me->kvm;
@@ -2343,7 +2366,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *m
                                continue;
                        if (vcpu == me)
                                continue;
-                       if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && 
!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
+                       if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && !vcpu_dy_runnable(vcpu))
                                continue;
                        if (yield_to_kernel_mode && 
!kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu))
                                continue;


Reply via email to