On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:14:08AM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > You must have a reason, but why didn't you completely remove
> > pciehp_green_led_on(), etc, and change the callers to use
> > pciehp_set_indicators() instead?
>
> Well, I don't have the exact reason here. I thought that it would be nice to
> preserve
> an existing interface and to hide some implementation details (e.g., status
> of the
> second indicator). I could completely remove
> pciehp_green_led_{on,off,blink}() and
> pciehp_set_attention_status() in v3 if you prefer.
I might be missing something, but I do think I would prefer to
completely remove pciehp_green_led_{on,off,blink}() and
pciehp_set_attention_status(). Then we'd have exactly one interface
to change indicator state.
